What is a Terrorist?

As a writer, I find myself constantly turning over in my mind questions that seem to have no logical answer based on history, philosophy or other tangible touchstones, as least for me. In the world we live in today, one of the critical questions is What is a terrorist?

In the West, we are programmed by contemporary events to think of terrorists as being Islamic fundamentalists willing to kill innocent people in order to achieve perceived religious obligations.

When I think of terrorists, I find myself asking questions from a different time. For example, were we white European settlers terrorists against the British? Were the French who provided American revolutionaries with material and people resources, aiders and abettors as we currently declare Iran and Syria?

In the famous movie Braveheart were the Scottish nationalists terrorists? What about the IRA? And, in the late 1920s, were the pre-cursors of the Nazis terrorists?

What about Christians? Were we terrorists against the Romans? And in the Crusades? Who were the terrorists then? Does it depend upon which set of years are considered?

In the time of the Civil Rights Movement, were radical blacks terrorists?

I am not sure about the technically, or culturally, correct answer to these questions. I suspect that terrorism, like most things in life, is in the eye of the beholder.

In fiction, we are able to explore these concepts, myths and situational realities.

What do you think a terrorist is?

What is the definition of . . .?

In the world of fiction, as I said, we can explore anything that we want. What is it that you find to be of interest from the standpoint of definitional reality?

1 Comment so far
Leave a comment

Hey Cym, interesting topic…Edward Peck, former U.S. Chief of Mission in Iraq and ambassador to Mauritania:

In 1985, when I was the Deputy Director of the Reagan White House Task Force on Terrorism, they asked us — this is a Cabinet Task Force on Terrorism; I was the Deputy Director of the working group — they asked us to come up with a definition of terrorism that could be used throughout the government. We produced about six, and each and every case, they were rejected, because careful reading would indicate that our own country had been involved in some of those activities. […] After the task force concluded its work, Congress got into it, and you can google into U.S. Code Title 18, Section 2331, and read the U.S. definition of terrorism. And one of them in here says — one of the terms, “international terrorism,” means “activities that,” I quote, “appear to be intended to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination or kidnapping.” […] Yes, well, certainly, you can think of a number of countries that have been involved in such activities. Ours is one of them. Israel is another. And so, the terrorist, of course, is in the eye of the beholder.



Leave a comment
Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

(required)

(required)